Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John Lowery, Respondent, v. John O. Spencer et al., Appellants, 1888 — 109 N.Y. 629 · caselaw · US
General
John Lowery, Respondent, v. John O. Spencer et al., Appellants
109 N.Y. 629·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Lowery, Respondent, v. John O. Spencer et al., Appellants.
(Submitted March 9, 1888
decided March 23, 1888.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made October 24, 1885, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Frederick L. Manning for appellants.
Charles H. Roys for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal under subdivison 3 of section 191 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for want of proper certificate; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.