General
Louisa P. Chard et al., Administrators, etc., Appellants, v. Cornelia A. Hamilton, as Administratrix, etc., Impleaded, etc., Respondent,
125 N.Y. 777·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louisa P. Chard et al., Administrators, etc., Appellants, v. Cornelia A. Hamilton, as Administratrix, etc., Impleaded, etc., Respondent,
(Argued February 6, 1891;
decided February 24, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made March 25,1890, which affirmed so much of a judgment, entered upon the report of a referee, as dismissed the complaint in this action as against the respondent.
Smrmel J. Crooks for appellants.
Sherman S. Rogers for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.