Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Stephen A. Walker, Respondent, v. The American National Bank, Appellant
49 N.Y. 659·New York Court of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Stephen A. Walker, Respondent, v. The American National Bank, Appellant.
(Argued April 4, 1872;
decided April 9, 1872.)
If attorneys transact business as brokers, they are entitled to compensation as such, but cannot charge a counsel fee for conversations with their employers about the business, unless by express contract.
This was an action upon an account for legal services assigned to plaintiff by Strong & Shepard, attorneys. A portion of the account was for services of plaintiff’s assignors in negotiating the sale of certain mortgages belonging to the defendant under an agreement that defendant should allow as compensation all received over forty per cent of amount of mortgages. Failing to effect a sale, the bank employed the assignors to negotiate a loan upon the security of the mortgages, with the promise that if the assignors succeeded they were to be compensated for their services in attempting to sell. The assignors succeeded in negotiating a loan, but defendant refused to consummate the transaction. There was also a charge in the bill of $3,000 for counsel fees in divers consultations in reference to the sale and the loan. The whole account was allowed by the referee.
Held, that the employment of Strong & Shepard in negotiating the sale and loan was as brokers, and the referee was not authorized to find an employment as counsel; that the assignors were not entitled to compensation both as brokers for doing the business and as counsel for conversations had in reference to it.
Moody JB. Smith for the appellant.
T. JR. Strong for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Grover, J.,]
Grover, J.,
reads for reversal and new trial. All concur. Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide event