Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The People of the State of New York v. Family Fund Society; In the Matter of the Application of Eugene H. Shorb et al., Respondents, v. Francis V. S. Oliver, Receiver, Appellant
159 N.Y. 534·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York v. Family Fund Society. In the Matter of the Application of Eugene H. Shorb et al., Respondents, v. Francis V. S. Oliver, Receiver, Appellant.
People v. Family Fund Society, 31 App. Div. 166, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted April 18, 1899;
decided May 2, 1899.)
, Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 13, 1898, reversing an order of the Special Term denying a motion made by Lizzie T. Shorb and others to vacate an order directing the receiver appointed upon the dissolution of defendant to pay a portion of the funds in his hands to certain claimants, and to require him personally to pay back into a trust company the amount paid by him pursuant to the said order.
Ernest Hall for appellant.
Raphael J. Moses for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order appealed from is not an order finally determining a special proceeding, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.