General
United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co. et al.; and Federal Power Commission v. Marr et al.
379 U.S. 958·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 644.
No. 693.
United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co. et al.; and Federal Power Commission v. Marr et al.
William T. Coleman, Jr., Richardson Dilworth and Harold E. Kohn for petitioner in No. 644. Solicitor General Cox, Ralph S. Spritzer, Frank Goodman, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock and Peter H. Schiff for petitioner in No. 693. John A. Ward III, Herf M. Weinert, Bruce R. Merrill, W. Mclver Streetman, Stanley M. Morley, Robert E. May and W. D. Deakins, Jr., for respondents in both .cases.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of two hours is allotted for oral argument.
Reported below: 336 ' F. 2d 320.