Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Minnie A. Blanchard, Plaintiff, v. Gordon B. Archer et al., Respondents, and William C. Johnson, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
184 N.Y. 590·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Minnie A. Blanchard, Plaintiff, v. Gordon B. Archer et al., Respondents, and William C. Johnson, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Blanchard v. Archer, 102 App. Div. 627, affirmed.
(Argued March 15, 1906;
decided April 3, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 18, 1905, affirming an amended final judgment in favor of defendants, respondents, in an action for partition.
John A. Garver and Harold Swain for appellant.
Jason, B. Parrish for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Ctjllen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Edward T. Bartlett, J. Not voting : Vann, J. Not sitting : Willard Bartlett, J.