Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
NATIONAL SUGAR REFINING COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, Appellant, v. TIETJEN & LANG DRY DOCK COMPANY, Appellee; BISON STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, Appellant, v. TIETJEN & LANG DRY DOCK COMPANY, Appellee
33 F.2d 356·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1929
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NATIONAL SUGAR REFINING COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, Appellant, v. TIETJEN & LANG DRY DOCK COMPANY, Appellee. BISON STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, Appellant, v. TIETJEN & LANG DRY DOCK COMPANY, Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 3, 1929.
Nos. 314, 315.
Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston and Maeklin, Brown, Lenahan & Speer, all of New York City (Leonard J. Matteson and Paul Speer, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
E. Curtis Bouse and Crowell & Bouse, all of New York City, for appellee.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decrees [33 F.(2d) 354] affirmed.