Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, Receiver, et al.
373 U.S. 929·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 403.
Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, Receiver, et al.
John A. Wilson for movant Compañía Azucarera Vertientes-Camaguey de Cuba. Victor Rabinowitz and Leonard B. Boudin for petitioner. Joseph Slavin for Sabbatino, and O. Dickerman Williams for Farr et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 372 U. S. 905, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Further consideration of the motion for leave to substitute Com-pañía Azucarera Vertientes-Camaguey de Cuba in place of Peter L. F. Sabbatino as a party respondent is postponed pending a hearing on the merits of the case.