Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
In the Matter of PHELPS MANOR REALTY COMPANY, a Debtor Corporation; Farrar TILNEY et al., Appellants, v. ESTATE of William Walter PHELPS
73 F.2d 1010·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of PHELPS MANOR REALTY COMPANY, a Debtor Corporation. Farrar TILNEY et al., Appellants, v. ESTATE of William Walter PHELPS.
No. 5639.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Oct. 11, 1934.
William Harris, of Newark, N. J., for appellants.
Pitney, Hai’din & Skinner, of Newark, N. J. (Shelton Pitney, of Newark, N. J., of counsel), for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAYIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On the particular facts of this ease, we find no error in the order of the court below dismissing the petition. In view of the pendency of the chancery suit in New Jersey which calls for a speedy decision in this ease, the order of the District Court is therefore affirmed without an opinion.