Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. et al. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al.; and Adams et al. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al.
332 U.S. 760·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 136.
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. et al. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al.; and Adams et al. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al.
J. T. Suggs, M. E. Clinton, Esmond Phelps, Frank H. Peterman, H. Payne Breazeale, Thomas T. Railey, Murray Hudson and Fred G. Hudson, Jr. for Thompson, Trustee, petitioner in No. 136.
Fred G. Benton for petitioners in No. 137.
Kemble K. Kennedy for respondents.
No. 137.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari denied.