Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tax
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Charles L. Briggs, Respondent, v. Henry H. Lyman, as State Commissioner of Excise of the State of New York, et al., Appellants
163 N.Y. 602·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Charles L. Briggs, Respondent, v. Henry H. Lyman, as State Commissioner of Excise of the State of New York, et al., Appellants.
People ex rel. Briggs v. Lyman, 48 App. Div. 484, affirmed.
(Argued June 6, 1900;
decided June 22, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 17, 1900, affirming an order of the Westchester County Court directing the county treasurer of that county to issue a liquor tax certificate to the relator.
N. JV. Stremahan and P. W. Gulli/nam, for appellants.
Alfred F. Smith for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Landon and Cullen, JJ.