Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Margaret Coby, Respondent, v. Frank Ibert, Appellant
141 N.Y. 586·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Margaret Coby, Respondent, v. Frank Ibert, Appellant.
(Submitted January 29, 1894;
decided February 27, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the City Court of Brooklyn, made November 29, 1893, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to strike out an amended complaint.
Moffett & Krmner for appellant.
H. G. Lansing for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.