Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The Board of Education of Union- Free School District No. 1 of the Town of Waterford, Respondent, v. Alexander Cunningham, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
139 N.Y. 608·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Board of Education of Union- Free School District No. 1 of the Town of Waterford, Respondent, v. Alexander Cunningham, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued June 19, 1893;
decided October 3, 1893.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made February 14, 1893, which denied a motion to dismiss an appeal by plaintiff herein.
G. B. Wellington for appellant.
J. W. Houghton for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.