Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Lucien S. Crandall, Appellant, v. Ernest R. Barron et al., as Executors, etc., Respondents
127 N.Y. 690·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lucien S. Crandall, Appellant, v. Ernest R. Barron et al., as Executors, etc., Respondents.
(Argued June 22, 1891;
decided October 6, 1891.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, made September 13, 1890, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and reversed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Williami P. Goodelle for appellant.
A. P. Smith for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm, and for judgment absolute against the appellant, with costs ; no opinion.
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.