Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Grigsby et al.; Coastal Marine Service of Texas, Inc., et al. v. Grigsby et al.; and Welder's Supply Co. of Lake Charles v. Grigsby et al.
396 U.S. 1033·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
January 15, 1970
No. 649.
No. 676.
No. 677.
Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Grigsby et al.; Coastal Marine Service of Texas, Inc., et al. v. Grigsby et al.; and Welder’s Supply Co. of Lake Charles v. Grigsby et al.
Fred H. Sievert, Jr., for petitioner in No. 649, Edmund E. Woodley for petitioners in No. 676, and Norman F. Anderson for petitioner in No. 677.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Petitions for writs of certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.
Reported below: 412 F. 2d 1011.