General
Paul Billings et al., Respondents, v. Henry H. Loomis et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another
163 N.Y. 566·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Paul Billings et al., Respondents, v. Henry H. Loomis et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another.
Billings v. Ostrander, 12 App. Div. 624, affirmed.
(Argued April 30, 1900;
decided May 15, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 8,1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a a motion for a new trial.
Raymond Cobb for appellants.
Louis L. Waters for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Cray,Bartlett,Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.