General
William Murray, et al., Respondents, v. Walter T. Miller et al., Appellants
178 N.Y. 602·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Murray, et al., Respondents, v. Walter T. Miller et al., Appellants.
Murray v. Miller, 86 App. Div. 623, affirmed.
(Argued April 6, 1904;
decided April 26, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 23, 1903, in favor of plaintiffs upon the submission of a controversy under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Augustus C. Brown, for appellants.
Benjamin F. Oardozo and Moses Esberg for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on' opinion in Murray v. Miller, 178 N. Y. 316).
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight,’ Yann and Cullen JJ.