General
George H. Jones, Plaintiff in Error, v. William Vane et al.
200 U.S. 614·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 405.
George H. Jones, Plaintiff in Error, v. William Vane et al.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted January 15, 1906.
Decided January 22, 1906.
Mr. William T. Birdsall for plaintiff in error. Mr. S. M. Stockslager and Mr. George C. Heard for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In error to. the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. San Francisco v. Itsell, 133 U. S. 65; Hopkins v. McLure, 133 U. S. 380; California v. Holladay, 159 U. S. 415; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361, 367; Kipley v. Illinois, 170 U. S. 182; Lynde v. Lynde, 181 U. S. 183; Western Union Telegraph Company v. Ann Arbor Railway Company, 178 U. S. 239.