Contracts · MBE-tested
Hugh J. Begley, Appellant, v. Louis Weddigen et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Louis Weddigen & Company, Respondents
179 N.Y. 542·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hugh J. Begley, Appellant, v. Louis Weddigen et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Louis Weddigen & Company, Respondents.
Begley v. Weddigen, 86 App. Piv. 629, affirmed.
(Argued June 8, 1904;
decided August 5, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered August 5, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Tidal Term.
Herbert T. Ketcham and Joseph H. Owens for appellant.
Alexander HUmenstiel for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the contract is indefinite and does not cover the claims in suit; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Absent: ITaight, J.