Bankruptcy
Cory LISENBEE, Appellant, v. Dean WHITMAN, Appellee.
252 So. 3d 1280·District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District·2018·FL
Brief incoming
Source-anchored Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Cory LISENBEE, Appellant,
v.
Dean WHITMAN, Appellee.
Case No. 5D18-396
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Opinion filed August 17, 2018
Rehearing Denied September 20, 2018
Cory Lisenbee, Lake Mary, pro se.
Joseph S. Justice, of Ringer, Henry, Buckley & Seacord, PA, Orlando, for Appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The trial court properly dismissed Appellant's amended complaint with prejudice. The applicable statute of limitations had run, and Appellant admittedly failed to comply or plead compliance with the mandatory presuit investigation and notice requirements set forth in chapter 766, Florida Statutes.
AFFIRMED.
ORFINGER, EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.