Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY v. HOLLAN
216 U.S. 615·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY v. HOLLAN.
ERROR TO THE COURT OP CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS.
No. 161.
Motion, to dismiss or affirm submitted March 14, 1910.
Decided March 21, 1910.
Writ of error to review a judgment of the state court in an action for personal injuries dismissed, without opinion, for want of jurisdiction.
Mr. James Hagerman, Mr. J. M. Bryson, and Mr. Cedi H. Smith for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. C. B. Randell and Mr. Judson H. Wood for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction.