Contracts · MBE-tested

HONEYWOOD et al. v. ROCKEFELLER, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, et al.

371 U.S. 1·Supreme Court of the United States·1962

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

HONEYWOOD et al. v. ROCKEFELLER, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, et al. No. 177. Decided October 8, 1962. Moses M. Falk for appellants. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, Irving Galt, Assistant Solicitor General, and Sheldon Raab, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellees. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. Since we agree with the District Court, from our examination of the record, “that no good cause has been shown for the granting of a preliminary injunction in advance of a trial upon which the facts necessary for a determination of the merits of this action can be fully developed,” the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment of the District Court is affirmed. Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.