Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
City of Omaha et al. v. Frank Brothers Footwear, Inc.
336 U.S. 935·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Certiorari Denied.
(See also Nos. 551 and 581, supra.)
No. 507.
City of Omaha et al. v. Frank Brothers Footwear, Inc.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of Nebraska. Certiorari denied.
Ralph E. Svoboda for petitioners. Charles S. Rhyne filed a brief for the National Institute of Municipal Law Officers, as amicus curiae, supporting the petition. M. James Spitser filed a brief for Best & Co., Inc., as amicus curiae, opposing the petition.