Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
General Drivers, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local Union No. 89, et al. v. American Tobacco Co., Inc.
348 U.S. 813·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 186.
General Drivers, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local Union No. 89, et al. v. American Tobacco Co., Inc.
Ralph H. Logan, David Previant, J. Albert Woll, Herbert S. Thatcher and James A. Glenn for petitioners.
Nelson Helm, George W. Whiteside, Ralph D. Ray and Francis E. Koch for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Court of Appeals of Kentucky. Cer-tiorari granted. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief setting forth the views of the National Labor Relations Board.