General
Cincinnati Northern Railroad Company, Petitioner, v. Leo Guy
246 U.S. 668·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 900.
Cincinnati Northern Railroad Company, Petitioner, v. Leo Guy.
March 25, 1918.
Mr. Harry N. Quigley for petitioner.
Miss Corinne L. Rice and Mr. Alonzo H. Ranes for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Michigan denied.