Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
UTAH RADIO PRODUCTS CO. et al. v. BOUDETTE et al.
69 F.2d 973·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UTAH RADIO PRODUCTS CO. et al. v. BOUDETTE et al.
No. 2826.
Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
April 6, 1934.
Herbert A. Baker, of Boston, Mass., for appellants.
George K. Woodworth, of Boston, Mass., for appellees.
Before WILSON and MORTON, Circuit Judges, and LETTS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The interlocutory decree of the District Court entered herein April 12, 1933> is vacated and this case remanded to that court for further proceedings, in accordance with law. The court does not pass upon the sufficiency of the moving papers or the opposing affidavits as challenged by the assignments of error Nos. 1 and 2. The District Court erred in not granting appellants’ motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction as it should not have been issued except upon compliance with the provisions of section 382, title 28 USCA. This is so, even if the appellees could otherwise justify, from the moving papers presented, the granting of a preliminary injunction as a proper exercise of judicial discretion.
The decree of the District Court is vacated and the ease is remanded to that court for further proceedings in accordance with law; neither party recovers costs of appeal.