Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
TEX TAN WELHAUSEN CO. et al. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
397 U.S. 819·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents to the remand.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
TEX TAN WELHAUSEN CO. et al. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
No. 1288.
Decided May 4, 1970
Theo. F. Weiss for petitioners.
Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come, and Linda Sher for respondent.
L. N. D. Wells, Jr., for Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, AFL-CIO, intervenor below.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of H. K. Porter Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, ante, p. 99.
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents to the remand.