Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
United States v. Windsor, Executor of the Estate of Spyer, et al.
568 U.S. 1078·Supreme Court of the United States·2012
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 12-307.
United States v. Windsor, Executor of the Estate of Spyer, et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 1066.] Vicki C. Jackson, Esq., of Cambridge, Mass., is invited to brief and argue this case as amicus curiae in support of the positions that the Executive Branch’s agreement with the court below that DOMA [Defense of Marriage Act] is unconstitutional deprives this Court of jurisdiction to decide this case, and that the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives lacks Article III standing in this case.