Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Noah H. Hopkins, Respondent, v. Wilhelm Braun, Appellant
62 N.Y. 612·New York Court of Appeals·1875·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Noah H. Hopkins, Respondent, v. Wilhelm Braun, Appellant.
(Submitted April 19, 1875;
decided April 30, 1875.)
This was a submission of a controversy under section 372 of the Oode. The case presented similar questions, and was decided upon the authority of Wood v. Squires (60 N. Y., 191).
Harison & De La Mare for the appellant.
Strong & Spear for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Miller, J.]
Miller, J.
reads for reversal of judgment, and for dismissal of the proceedings.
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.