Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Henry Kemp, Respondent, v. James Q. Holcomb, Appellant
53 N.Y. 633·New York Court of Appeals·1873·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry Kemp, Respondent, v. James Q. Holcomb, Appellant.
(Argued June 9, 1873;
decided September 23, 1873.)
The prominent questions in this case were upon exceptions to the charge. Held, that the exceptions were insufficient, not being to the charge as made. Other questions as to the admission and rejection of evidence were disposed of upon the facts in the case.
A. J. Perry for the appellant.
H. C. Place for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Folger, J.,]
Folger, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.