Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Annette B. Wetmore, now Annette B. Markoe, Respondent, v. William B. Wetmore, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
166 N.Y. 603·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Annette B. Wetmore, now Annette B. Markoe, Respondent, v. William B. Wetmore, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Wetmore v. Wetmore, 56 App. Div. 625, appeal dismissed.
(Argued February 27, 1901;
decided March 19, 1901.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 9, 1901, affirming an order of Special Term appointing the Continental Trust Company of the city of New York to execute a trust created by the will of Samuel Wetmore, deceased.
Thomas P. Wickes for appellant.
Flamen B. Candler and Robert W. Candler for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Landon, JJ. Not'voting: O’Bríen, J.