Contracts · MBE-tested
Corry E. TULLAR, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
72 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Corry E. TULLAR, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 7463.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 5, 1934.
Sherwood & Heiman, of Seattle, Wash.,, for appellant.
J. Chas. Dennis, U. S. Atty., and Warren G. Magnuson, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Seattle, Wash.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of transcript of record and briefs filed and oral arguments had, it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court herein be affirmed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court issue as provided in rule 32.