Contracts · MBE-tested
Daniman et al. v. Board of Education of the City of New York et al.; and Daniman et al. v. Board of Education of the City of New York et al.
352 U.S. 950·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas would grant the rehearing in accordance with the action taken in Cahill v. New York, New Haven & Hartford R. Co., 351 U. S. 183. Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 385,
No. 378.
October Term, 1954.
Daniman et al. v. Board of Education of the City of New York et al.; and Daniman et al. v. Board of Education of the City of New York et al.
Osmond K. Fraenkel for appellants-petitioners. Peter Campbell Brown, Seymour B. Quel and Bernard Friedlander for appellees-respondents.
[MAJORITY]
The motion for leave to file petition for rehearing and for incidental relief is denied. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The motion for leave to use the record in No. 385, October Term, 1954, Daniman v. Board of Education, 348 U. S. 933, is granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas would grant the rehearing in accordance with the action taken in Cahill v. New York, New Haven & Hartford R. Co., 351 U. S. 183. Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Reported below: See 1 N. Y. 2d 855, 135 N. E. 2d 732.