Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
McMILLAN CONTRACTING CO. et al., Appellants, v. Walter L. ABERNATHY et al.
2 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1924
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
McMILLAN CONTRACTING CO. et al., Appellants, v. Walter L. ABERNATHY et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
July 9, 1924.)
No. 6134.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri..
Dismissing appeals 284 F. 354, on mandate from decision of Supreme Court, 263 U. S. 438, 44 S. Ct. 200, 68 L. Ed. 378.
Justin D. Bowersock, Robert B. Fizzell, Guy V. Head, Arthur Miller, Frank P. Barker, and Clarence S. "Palmer, all of Kansas City, Mo., for appellants.
O. H. Dean, H. M. Langworthy, Roy B. Thomson, and Melville W. Borders, all of Kansas City, Mo., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Mandate of Supreme Court of the United States ordered filed and recorded, and appeal from United States District Court dismissed, with costs, etc.