General
HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. et al. v. MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY, NEW JERSEY
375 U.S. 43·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. et al. v. MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY, NEW JERSEY.
No. 326.
Decided October 21, 1963.
T. Girard Wharton and John W. Fritz for appellants.
Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Theodore I. Botter, First Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.