Contracts · MBE-tested
McLEOD v. OHIO
378 U.S. 58212 L. Ed. 2d 1037·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons assigned in the dissenting opinion in Massiah v. United States, supra, at 207.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
McLEOD v. OHIO.
No. 14, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of Ohio for consideration in light of Massiah v. United States, 377 U. S. 201.
Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons assigned in the dissenting opinion in Massiah v. United States, supra, at 207.