Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
DuVernay v. United States
393 U.S. 976·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 442,
Mise.
DuVernay v. United States.
Benjamin Smith, Morton Stavis, Arthur Kinoy, and William M. Kunstler for petitioner.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Case transferred to appellate docket and set for oral argument immediately following No. 403 [ante, p. 922].