Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
George W. White, Appellant, v. Charles White et al., Respondents
110 N.Y. 642·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George W. White, Appellant, v. Charles White et al., Respondents.
(Argued June 19, 1888;
decided June 26, 1888.)
Motion to dismiss appeal from order of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, which reversed a final judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a referee’s report on an accounting,as directed by an interlocutory judgment, and sent the case back to a new referee
Albert Stickney for motion.
Artemus H. Holmes opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to grant motion.
All concur ; no opinion.
Appeal dismissed.