Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
In re Disbarment of Mardian
430 U.S. 903·Supreme Court of the United States·1977
Mr. Justice Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. D-46.
In re Disbarment of Mardian.
[MAJORITY]
It having been reported to the Court that the Supreme Court of California and the United States District Court for the District of Columbia have vacated their orders suspending Robert Charles Mardian from the practice of law, it is ordered that the order of this Court entered March 31, 1975 [420 U. S. 1001], suspending Robert Charles Mardian from the further practice of law in this Court is vacated and that the rule to show cause issued March 31, 1975, is discharged.
Mr. Justice Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.