Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Lustig v. United States
333 U.S. 835·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1389,
October Term, 1946.
Lustig v. United States.
Louis Halle for petitioner.
[MAJORITY]
The petition received from petitioner on July 5, 1947, as supplemented by his petition received January 28, 1948, is treated as a petition for rehearing and rehearing is granted. The order entered June 16,1947,331 U. S. 853, denying certiorari is vacated and the petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is granted.