General
CLAYTON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. UNITED STATES
384 U.S. 156·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CLAYTON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. UNITED STATES.
No. 893.
Decided May 2, 1966.
Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, Peyton B. Abbott, Deputy Attorney General, and Charles D. Barham, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, I. Henry Kutz and Robert A. Bernstein for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. American Insurance Co. v. Lucas, 314 U. S. 575; Public Service Comm’n v. Brashear Lines, 306 U. S. 204.