Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Edward Kelly, Appellant, v. James C. Brower, Respondent
132 N.Y. 539·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward Kelly, Appellant, v. James C. Brower, Respondent.
(Argued January 21. 1892;
decided February 12, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made December 10,1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision - of the court on trial at Special Term.
This action was brought to recover back an installment paid upon contracts for the purchase of real estate. Plaintiff declined to take a conveyance because of an alleged failure of title in defendant to a strip of the land described in the contracts.
The court, after a consideration of the various deeds, maps and surveys, reached the conclusion that defendant’s title covered, and that he was the owner in fee of the strip in question.
Joseph A. Burr for appellant.
William T. Gilbert for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Bradley, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.