Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
KENNETH HEATER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
70 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
KENNETH HEATER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
No. 5404.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
April 17, 1934.
Herman F. Reich, of Sunbury, Pa., for the United States.
Before BUFFINGTON, DAYIS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
We have carefully considered the arguments of appellant in the above-entitled cause, but do not find any ground which justifies reversal. The order of the District Judge is accordingly affirmed.