Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Securities
Stonebraker-Zea Company, Appellant, v. United States
245 U.S. 642·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 84.
Stonebraker-Zea Company, Appellant, v. United States.
Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Submitted January 23, 1918.
Decided January 28, 1918.
Mr. Henry B. Martin for appellant.
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Kearjul for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed upon the authority of McCaskill Co. v. United States, 216 U. S. 504, 514; Washington Securities Co. v. United States, 234 U. S. 76, 78; Wright-Blodgett Co. v. United States, 236 U. S. 397, 402, 405; Causey v. United States, 240 U. S. 399, 401; and cause remanded to the District Court of. the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma.