Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tax
Lynbrook Gardens, Inc. v. Ullman
322 U.S. 742·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 848.
Lynbrook Gardens, Inc. v. Ullman.
May 15, 1944.
Mr. Cornelius 0. Donahue for petitioner.
Mr. Thayer Burgess for respondent.
Messrs. Ignatius M. Wilkinson, Ray L. Chesebro, Cansón Taggart, Leo Brown, and Charles S. Rhyne on behalf of the National Institute of Municipal Law Officers; Mr. Mortimer M. Kassell on behalf of the State Tax Commission of New York; and Mr. L. Arnold Frye on behalf of Chautauqua County et al., filed briefs, as amici curiae, in support of the petition.
Mr. Milton Pinkus filed a brief on behalf of Anne M. Leach, as amicus curiae, in opposition to the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New York denied.