Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The City of Brooklyn, Respondent, v. Catharine I. Mackay et al., Appellants
152 N.Y. 650·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The City of Brooklyn, Respondent, v. Catharine I. Mackay et al., Appellants.
City of Brooklyn v. Mackay, 13 App. Div. 105, appeal dismissed.
(Argued March 15, 1897;
decided April 20, 1897.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 20, 1897, which affirmed a judgment and order of Special Term appointing commissioners in condemnation proceedings.
James C. Church for appellants.
Jesse Johnson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order is not final, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.