Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Constitutional Law · MBE-tested
Leary v. United States
392 U.S. 903·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1365.
Leary v. United States.
Robert J. Haft for petitioner.
Solicitor General Gris-wold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir.
Certiorari granted limited to Questions I and IV, presented by the petition which read as follows:
“I. Whether the registration and tax provisions in 26 U. S. C. Sections 4741 (a), 4742 and 4744 (a), as applied to Petitioner, violate his privilege against self incrimination protected by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and his rights thereunder as amplified by this Court in three recently decided cases: Marchetti v. U. S., 390 U. S. 39 (1968); Grosso v. U. S., 390 U. S. 62 (1968); and Haynes v. U. S., 390 U. S. 85 (1968).”
“IV. Whether Petitioner was denied due process under the Fifth Amendment by the application, under the circumstances of this case, of the provisions of 21 U. S. C. § 176a, providing that an inference may be drawn respecting the illegal origin and nature of marihuana solely from possession thereof.”