General
The Union Consolidated Mining Company of Tennessee, Appellant, v. Julius E. Raht et al., Respondents
68 N.Y. 629·New York Court of Appeals·1877·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Union Consolidated Mining Company of Tennessee, Appellant, v. Julius E. Raht et al., Respondents.
(Argued February 13, 1877;
decided February 20, 1877.)
Reported below, 9 Hun, 208.
Simon Sterne for the appellant.
William Man for the respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal. Ho opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.