Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Opp Cotton Mills, Inc., et al. v. Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor
312 U.S. 657·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 330.
Opp Cotton Mills, Inc., et al. v. Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor.
February 17, 1941.
[MAJORITY]
The opinion in this case is amended as follows: 4th line from the top of page 14, strike the word “We” and insert the following phrase: “On the record before us, we”.