Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Fletcher v. Wool et al.; Fletcher v. Willard R. Cook & Co., Inc. et al.; Fletcher v. D. H. Goodman, Inc.; Fletcher v. Krise, Receiver, et al.; Fletcher v. Barron et al.; Fletcher v. National Bank of Commerce; Fletcher v. National Bank of Commerce et al.; and Fletcher v. Maupin
322 U.S. 749·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Mr. Justice Jackson and Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 861.
No. 862.
Fletcher v. Wool et al.; Fletcher v. Willard R. Cook & Co., Inc. et al.; Fletcher v. D. H. Goodman, Inc.; Fletcher v. Krise, Receiver, et al.; Fletcher v. Barron et al.; Fletcher v. National Bank of Commerce; Fletcher v. National Bank of Commerce et al.; and Fletcher v. Maupin.
No. 863.
No. 864.
No. 865.
No. 866.
No. 867.
No. 868.
May 22, 1944.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Mr. Justice Jackson and Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Reported below: 138 F. 2d 740, 742.